Enver Masud, "Kosovo Bombing:
Good Intentions, Bad Strategy?," The Wisdom Fund, March 27, 1999
Enver Masud, "Kosovo Bombing:
Bad Intentions, Good Strategy?," The Wisdom Fund, March 28, 1999
[President Clinton knew that "air strikes might provoke Serb soldiers into
greater acts of butchery." . . .
Professor of International Law, Francis A. Boyle, says "the former
Yugoslavia disintegrated as a state as the Badinter Commission found. As a
result of this disintegration, the Kosovar People exercised their right of
self-determination to establish the Kosova Republic in accordance with
standard international law and practice.--Enver Masud, "Milosevic Indicted, Clinton Poised
to Sellout Kosovars," The Wisdom Fund, May 28, 1999]
Enver Masud, "Winning and Losing
in Yugoslavia," The Wisdom Fund, June 6, 1999
Eric Margolis, "The Real Victors
in Kosovo," Toronto Sun, June 13, 1999
[The message could scarcely have been blunter: if you want Albanian consent
for the Trans-Balkan pipeline, you had better wrest Kosovo out of the hands
of the Serbs.--George Monbiot, "A
discreet deal in the pipeline," Guardian, February 15, 2001]
Lutz Kleveman, "The New Great
Game," Guardian, October 20, 2003
[Just as in the 1990s, and just as erroneously, a
self-righteous West has seized on the Balkans as an opportunity to parade
before the world in the unfamiliar guise of champion of democracy and
national self-determination, and protector of Muslims. . . .
Kosovo's status is governed by U.N. Security Council Resolution 1244, which
envisages only self-government for Kosovo, and acknowledges the "sovereignty
and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia." Kosovo's
status can't be changed without a new resolution.
To be sure, the status quo is unsustainable. But this status quo is one
entirely of NATO's making. Eager to demonstrate that it had relevance even
though the Cold War had long ended, NATO pulverized Yugoslavia with cluster
bombs, depleted uranium and cruise missiles for 11 weeks, in the name of its
newly proclaimed mission of humanitarian intervention.--George Szamuely, "A Saga of
Injustice and Hypocrisy: The Absurdity of 'Independent' Kosovo,"
counterpunch.org, February 15, 2008]
Nicholas Kulish and C. J. Chivers, "Kosovo
Is Recognized but Rebuked by Others," New York Times, February 19, 2008
[First, Kosovo is not gaining independence or even minimal self-government.
It will be run by an appointed High Representative and bodies appointed by
the U.S., European Union and NATO. . . .
Second, Washington's immediate recognition of Kosovo confirms once again
that U.S. imperialism will break any and every treaty or international
agreement it has ever signed, including agreements it drafted and imposed by
force and violence on others.--Sara Flounders, "Kosovo's
'independence': Washington gets a new colony in the Balkans,"
workers.org, February 21, 2008]
VIDEO: "Samantha Power v. Jeremy Scahill: A
Debate on U.S. Actions in the Balkans, the Independence of Kosovo, the Iraq
Sanctions and Humanitarian Intervention," democracynow.org, February
22, 2008
Danica Kirka, "Putin's Likely Successor, Pledging Support for
Serbia, Signs Pipeline Deal," Associated Press, February 26, 2008
[Independent Kosovo is the result of a military-based conflict management
or, rather, mismanagement. It militates against two of Nobel's criteria in
that it has not lead to fraternity between peoples and it has not reduced
armaments in the world. Kosovo declared itself independent in February this
year (probably one reason why Ahtisaari received it this year) and is the
result of the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, on the one hand and NATO's 78
days of merciless bombings in 1999. That bombing - indisputably 100% on the
side of the Albanian hardliners - is the main reason why Kosovo's
independence is supported by the US and a few EU countries.--Jan Oberg, "Peace Laureate Ahtisaari endorsed
terrorism," transnational.org, October 22, 2008]
[ . . . a profile of the Kosovo Liberation Army at HistoryCommons.org
includes numerous mainstream citations from 1998-99 indicating that the KLA,
working together with the Albanian Mafia, had taken control of Balkan heroin
trafficking routes and was funneling the profits into its political
activities. The United States continued supporting the KLA during this
period and even removed it from the State Department's list of terrorist
organizations, despite statements from US officials that it was a terrorist
group with strong evidence of links to al Qaeda.--Muriel Kane, "Whistleblower: Bin Laden was US proxy until
9/11," rawstory.com, July 31, 2009]
[The most disturbing aspect of the Kosovo case is that a purported
humanitarian intervention served mainly to increase the scale of atrocities.
. . . The advocates of humanitarian intervention give too little
consideration to this danger.--David N. Gibbs, "WAS KOSOVO THE GOOD
WAR?," tikkun.org, July/August 2009
