by Steven Morris
British scientists at Porton Down have not been able to establish where the novichok
nerve agent used to poison Sergei and Yulia Skripal was made, it has emerged.
Gary Aitkenhead, the chief executive of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
(DSTL) at Porton Down, Wiltshire, said it had not proved it was created in Russia.
Aitkenhead confirmed the substance required "extremely sophisticated methods to create
something probably only in the capabilities of a state actor". . . .
John Pilger, "Iraq: The Crime of the
Century," New Statesman, December 10, 2009
Pepe Escobar, "BRICS Against Washington
Consensus," Asia Times, July 15, 2014
Martin Williams, "Does the UK's case against Russia stack up?," channel4.com, March 26, 2018
Patrick Henningsen, "Russia
'Novichok' Hysteria Proves Politicians and Media Haven't Learned the Lessons of
Iraq," consortiumnews.com, March 31, 2018
"Toxic Relations," RT.com, April 4, 2018
Greg Heffer, "Foreign Office deletes tweet claiming Salisbury nerve
agent made in Russia," sky.com, April 4, 2018
"The Best Explanation For The Skripal Drama Is Still ... Food
Poisoning," moonofalabama.org, April 6, 2018
VIDEO: "RT sheds
light on Skripal saga inconsistencies as OPCW releases report,"
RT.com, April 12, 2018
lab says 'BZ toxin' used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service,"
rt.com, April 14, 2018
[unlike Russia, the US is yet to destroy its chemical weapon stockpiles, as required
under the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1997.--M K Bhadrakumar, "Russia
exposes British lies on Skripal, but trail leads to US," atimes.com, April 19, 2018]