by Patrick J. Buchanan
			
			
			In the Cold War, India aligned with Moscow and repeatedly fought a smaller
			Pakistan that was our friend. In the war on terror, no ally has taken
			greater risks than Musharraf. While both India and Pakistan refused to sign
			the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, India was first to break faith with a
			West that gave it nuclear technology and the first to test nuclear weapons.
			
			Why, then, did Bush agree to transfer U.S. nuclear technology only to India?
			In so doing, he insulted an ally and blew a hole right through the NPT
			regime on which we stand to make our demands on Iran and North Korea. . . .
			
			India agreed to let the International Atomic Energy Agency inspect 14 of its
			22 nuclear facilities, while eight, military in nature, are off-limits. . . .
			
			Would the United States permit Iran, which signed the NPT and has allowed
			IAEA inspections of all known nuclear facilities, to agree to a deal like
			this? No way. We don't trust them - but we trust a democratic India that
			already has the fruits of its past deceit, a nuclear arsenal. . . .
			
			Israel, which has also refused to sign the NPT and has 200 to 300 nuclear
			weapons, will demand the same nuclear technology that India got. On what
			grounds can Bush deny Israel?
			
			And while Bush may grant exemptions from U.S. law and the NPT regime for
			countries he views as friendly and democratic, China is likely to provide
			similar aid to its friends, democratic or not, and step into the breach Bush
			opened with Pakistan.
			
			Iran will use the U.S. concessions to India to show U.S. hypocrisy. . . .
			
			
			FULL TEXT
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			Enver Masud, "Iran Has an 'Inalienable Right' to
			Nuclear Energy," The Wisdom Fund, January 16, 2006
			
			
			Bruce Loudon, "US looks at plan to oust Musharraf," The Australian, March
			14, 2007
			
			
	
	
	